Witness a miracle

The following is a verifiable fact, not an opinion and presents the very first scientific proof for the existence of a Supreme Being that we call God. The purpose of this article is not to convince anybody, but rather present tangible evidence that can be scrutinized. I do not believe I can convince anyone because it has to come from within the sincere heart.

The following will prove:

1. that a mathematically coded document exists

2. that it does satisfy the 6 conditions mentioned in ‘Does God Really Exist?’

3. Does not use purely arbitrary numbers

4. Is simple to understand but impossible to imitate considering its layers of complexity.

5. Contains a signature of its author based around HIS identity

The best way to realize that something cannot be duplicated is to try and duplicate even a small part of it and we are going to try it because it is a necessary step. The mathematically coded document that we are analyzing says:

“Do not accept any information without first verifying it. You have been give the hearing, the eyesight and the mind and you are responsible for using them”

How do we know what we have said so far is true? Establishing it’s authenticity is imperative so that we can know if we are on the right track towards our goal of perfect happiness

The mathematical code - irrefutable evidence

A little exercise

Before we look at the overwhelming evidence of a mathematically coded, superhuman document let us look at a little example that will illustrate its ‘simple to understand, impossible to imitate’ properties.

Every sentence has a mathematical structure. The statement ‘How are you?’ has 9 letters and 3 words. If we try and change the structure slightly, say to 10 letters but want to convey the same, exact meaning, we find that we have to do some work. It might not even be possible to make a slight change to the structure and keep the same meaning.

Now what about changing more complex properties of the structure? Take the following sentence: Jack and Jill went up the hill. This has 2 ‘A’s and 4 ‘L’s. If we want to change the sentence to have 3 ‘A’s and 3 ‘L’s the task becomes increasingly difficult. The words ‘Jack’ and ‘Jill’ are proper nouns and cannot be changed. The word ‘up’ cannot be changed to ‘over’, and ‘the’ cannot be changed to ‘a’ because this would change the meaning.

Conclusion of this exercise:

It is obvious that as more restrictions are placed on the mathematical structure of a sentence it becomes harder to construct the sentence, and the quality of the literature deteriorates rapidly.

What would be the attributes of a document from the Creator?

Imagine a document from our Creator, a document that would prove the very existence of such a Creator. What would it be like? How would it start? If you wrote a book would you not put your name on it? And who you are?

So how about this document starting by identifying its author.

In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

Suppose this mathematical code used as its foundation, this opening statement in the following unique way that:

Each word of this opening statement appeared in the document in a precise pattern.

At the very outset, a unique document

Imagine a library with a million volumes. How many books would you find where the opening statement consisted of X letters, and each word of the opening statement appeared in the book in multiples of X? You would probably find none. At the very outset you would know this was something quite unique.

WORD*	FREQUENCY
Name	19 = 19 x 1
GOD	2698= 19 x 142
Most Gracious	57 = 19 x3
Most Merciful	114 = 19 x 6

* see note at end of article

The higher the number X, the more difficult this would be to do. If X were 2, it would be easier to make a pattern. But if X were a higher number, like 17 or 19, it would be much more difficult.

Is this a coincidence? Let us take a closer look.

Note the multipliers 1, 142, 3 and 6 add up to 152 or 19 x 8, 8 being the index of prime 19.

Complexity

Moreover, if this were the case, we could see that our Jack and Jill example above has now been presented in a different way and to a much greater degree. Let us build a little more complexity on this. If each of the letters of the opening statement was taken, and placed in front of a chapter, so that the frequency of that letter in that chapter was a multiple of X then we can see a very intricate pattern developing.

Please refer back to the article ‘Does God really exist?’ to the paragraph that details the kind of perfect proof - one that is not limited by location, time, language or education - one that is physical and verifiable.

Another layer of complexity

What if, instead of one letter taken from the opening statement, a set of letters ranging from 1 to 5 is used at the beginning of each chapter, and the sum of the letters that appear before a chapter adds up to a total, in that chapter, to a multiple of X ? We have added a layer of complexity.

Is this a coincidence? Who would go to this trouble and why?

Let’s add another layer of complexity.

In addition to multiple letters being arranged to fit the mathematical pattern, remember we said that the words of the opening statement appeared in the document in multiples of this number X - and that the same letters also appeared at the beginning of the chapters. Well if we increased the count of one of the words from the opening statement in one of the chapters prefixed with these letters, two sets of equations would be out - the count of words and the frequency of the prefixed letters. We are now dealing with interlocking relations across chapters.

Chapter	Prefix with initial	Total Occurrence	Pattern
2	A.L.M	9899	19 x 521
3	A.L.M	5662	19 x 298
7	A.L.M.SS	5320	19 X 280
10	A.L.R	2489	19 X 131
11	A.L.R	2489	19 X 131
12	A.L.R	2375	19 X 125
13	A.L.M.R	1482	19 X 78
14	A.L.R	1197	19 X 63
15	A.L.R	912	19 X 48
19	K.H.Y.’A.SS	798	19 X 42
20	TT.H	See below
26	TT.S.M	See below
27	TT.S	See below
28	TT.S.M	See below
29	A.L.M	1672	19 x 88
30	A.L.M	1254	19 x 66
31	A.L.M	817	19 x 43
32	A.L.M	570	19 x 30
36	Y.S	285	19 x 15
38	SS	See below
40	HH.M	See below
41	HH.M	See below
42	HH.M. A.S.Q	209	19 x 11
43	HH.M	See below
44	HH.M	See below
45	HH.M	See below
46	HH.M	See below
50	Q	57	19 X 3
68	N	133	19 X 7

There are 14 sets of initials in the document

[15:87] We have given you the seven pairs, …

The gematrical value of these seven pairs (14) is equal to 1709

Intricacy

Single interlocking across chapters

Chapter	Prefix	Respective	frequency	of	prefix	initials	Total
7	A.L.M.SS	2529	1530	1164	97		97
19	K.H.Y.’A.SS	137	175	343	117	26	26
38	SS	29					29

The frequencies of SS across chapters prefixed with SS is 152 (19 x 8) 152

More Intricacy

Multiple interlocking across chapters

Chapter	Prefix	Respective	Frequency	Of	Prefix	Initials	Total
19	K.H.Y.’A.SS	137	175	343	117	26	175
20	TT.H	28	251				279
26	TT.S.M	33	94	484			611
27	TT.S	27	94				121
28	TT.S.M	19	102	460			581

Total occurrence of the TT,H,S and M is 1767 or 19 x 93 1767

Still more intricacy

Another Layer - the frequencies themselves form complex relationships

Chapter	Prefix	Freq. of H	Freq. of M	Total		=19X	Digit sum	=19X
40	HH.M	64	380	444			21
41	HH.M	48	276	324			27
42	HH.M	53	300	353	1121	59	11	59
43	HH.M	44	324	368			17
44	HH.M	16	150	166			13
45	HH.M	31	200	231			6
46	HH.M	36	225	261	1026	54	18	54

Total occurrence of the HH M is 19 x 113 2147

Chapter	Prefix	Freq. of H	Freq. of M	Total		=19X	Digit sum	=19X
40	HH.M	64	380	444			21
41	HH.M	48	276	324			27
42	HH.M	53	300	353			11
43	HH.M	44	324	368	1045	55	17	55
44	HH.M	16	150	166			13
45	HH.M	31	200	231			6
46	HH.M	36	225	261	1102	58	18	58

Total occurrence of the HH M is 19 x 113 2147

For the first chart:

1) Numbers in BOLD add to 19 x 59 and the sum of the digits for these numbers is also 59.

2) Numbers in RED add to 19 x 54 and the sum of the digits for these numbers is also 54.

For the second chart:

3) Numbers in BOLD add to 19 x 55 and the sum of the digits for these numbers is also 55.

4) Numbers in RED add to 19 x 58 and the sum of the digits for these numbers is also 58.

Imagine trying to solve a 7 x 2 matrix with numbers that fit these equations. When you roll two dice you get 6 x 6 possible numbers or 6^2 (6 to the power of 2). Assuming the solution lies with 3 digit numbers, we are trying to find 14 such numbers, each between 1 and 1000. It is like rolling 14 dice, each with one thousand possible numbers, or 1000^14.= 10^42

We would have to do,

Total 42 digits and 14 numbers (for # 1 and #2)=56

Total 42 digits and 14 numbers (for # 3 and #4)=56

Total calculations = 112 for each unique 14 number combination

=112 X 10^42 calculations

Number of calculations that can be done in one year is,

› Calculations / second x # of seconds in year

› for the fastest supercomputer 43 trillion calculations/sec

› = 43 trillion x 60 (sec) x 60 (min) x 24 (hrs) x 365.25 (days)

› = 43 x 10^12 x 31557600

› = 4.3 x 10^13 x 3.15567 x 10^7

› = 13.569381 x 10^(20) = 1.3569381 x 10^21

Divide the two numbers in RED to find the total number of years at 43 trillion calculations per second,

› 1.12 x 10^44 / 1.3569381 x 10^21

› = (1.12/1.36) x 10^(44-21) = 8.25 x 10^22 years

Or 82.5 billion trillion years

If we tried the above calculation assuming a two digit solution for each of the 14 slots (or dice), we would find that we do not get a solution.

Actually, even with a 3 digit solution assumed, the computer would not know when it reached the correct solution for any one slot (e.g. 64, 380 … 225) from the above 7 x 2 matrix – that it was the correct solution and would simply press ahead. Consequently it would never find the right solution, even after 82.5 billion years.

So far we have seen layer upon layer of complexity. Imagine a literary work of art, with stunning scientific statements and rules for living, with an intricate, interlocking mathematical structure of letters, the frequencies of these letters themselves being very complex. Could there be more?